Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Gian77
    Junior Member
    • Nov 2013
    • 3

    #1

    Suggested approach for illumina MiSeq library preparation for microbial communities s

    Hi all,
    I am sorry if my question sould sound stupid but I am rather new to NGS technologies and illumina platform
    We are going to perform a micorbial community ecology study. We have a set of 48 samples that should be selectively amplified for variable 16S DNA regions.
    Could anyone have suggest a suitable and cheap solution for this kind of amplicon sequencing approach?
    I would like to reduce the number of libraries by multiplexing indexed samples, but many protocols are described in literature... Which one is the best solution for you own experiences?
    Thanks a lot in advance,
    Gian
  • GenoMax
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2008
    • 7142

    #2
    You will get multiple suggestions from different folks on the forum but I will get things started with this: http://www.nature.com/nmeth/journal/...meth.2634.html
    Last edited by GenoMax; 01-07-2014, 08:52 AM.

    Comment

    • microgirl123
      Senior Member
      • Jun 2012
      • 199

      #3
      Illumina has a published method. We've been using an adaptation of this method for a while now and it works well. The biggest hurdle is to get the first round of PCR working.

      Comment

      • GenoMax
        Senior Member
        • Feb 2008
        • 7142

        #4
        @microgirl123 meant to probably link to this app note: http://res.illumina.com/documents/pr..._miseq_16s.pdf

        If not please correct.

        Comment

        • microgirl123
          Senior Member
          • Jun 2012
          • 199

          #5
          @GenoMax - what I linked is the link to the actual protocol that the app note refers to.

          Illumina now has a step-by-step protocol for creating 16s (or any other amplicon) libraries. The only thing you need to buy from Illumina is the Nextera adapters. This should be really helpful for labs that are just starting out on PCR amplicon sequencing.

          ETA: You might need an Illumina account (free) to access the bulletin and protocol.

          Comment

          • MU Core
            Member
            • Apr 2008
            • 60

            #6
            These articles are good references.

            http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2010/06/02/1000080107



            Our biggest hurdle was identifying the extraction methods that effectively removed the PCR inhibitors from the sample.

            Comment

            • Gian77
              Junior Member
              • Nov 2013
              • 3

              #7
              Thanks a lot for your replies. My biggest perplexity is also related to find a good and relatively cheap sequencing service that has an experience on amplicon sequencing on the illumina miseq platform. Do you have some tips on this?
              Thanks again for all your replies,
              Gian

              Comment

              • ScottC
                Senior Member
                • Jan 2008
                • 244

                #8
                MU Core... are you willing to share the methods you've found for inhibitor removal? This is our biggest hurdle with 16S survey sequencing projects, too.

                Comment

                • MU Core
                  Member
                  • Apr 2008
                  • 60

                  #9
                  Scott, our facility doesn't perform the extractions in-house but works with the researchers to develop the best method in their own lab.

                  We do still see researcher to researcher variability for PCR failure rates which we believe to be due to inhibitors. The vast majority of our samples are mouse fecal samples. Our most consistent group is performing a manual precipitations with ammonium acetate and isopropanol, followed by purification over a DNeasy column; a basic extraction method. I believe the success with this method has quite a bit to do the with experience level of the individual performing the extractions.

                  Side-by-side comparisons were performed with commercial kits. The manual extraction method did provide higher yields and cost less. If a commercial kit is the option you would like to pursue, I recommend speaking with the folks at MO BIO. There inhibitor removal technology performed well with kits covering a wide range of environmental samples.

                  Comment

                  • ScottC
                    Senior Member
                    • Jan 2008
                    • 244

                    #10
                    Hi MU Core,

                    We don't perform the extractions either... but, like you, we do have to deal with the poor quality samples that come our way from customers, from time to time. We usually recommend the MoBio kits, but I'm always interested to hear people's experiences. Unfortuantely, our samples come from very diverse sources so I doubt there will be a single method that suits all. Often we're dealing with very low concentrations of DNA too, which complicates things.

                    Comment

                    Latest Articles

                    Collapse

                    • SEQadmin2
                      Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
                      by SEQadmin2



                      Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

                      Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
                      ...
                      10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
                    • SEQadmin2
                      New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
                      by SEQadmin2


                      Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

                      We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
                      ...
                      09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

                    ad_right_rmr

                    Collapse

                    News

                    Collapse

                    Topics Statistics Last Post
                    Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
                    0 responses
                    57 views
                    0 reactions
                    Last Post SEQadmin2  
                    Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
                    0 responses
                    41 views
                    0 reactions
                    Last Post SEQadmin2  
                    Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
                    0 responses
                    46 views
                    0 reactions
                    Last Post SEQadmin2  
                    Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
                    0 responses
                    46 views
                    0 reactions
                    Last Post SEQadmin2  
                    Working...