Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • LindsayS
    Junior Member
    • Oct 2011
    • 4

    Equalizer kit versus qPCR for AmpliSeq libraries

    I am curious if anyone is currently using the Equalizer kit from Life Tech to prepare their libraries for templation. If so, are you bulking multiple libraries together, and are you finding that it does a good job of having somewhat equal amounts of reads per library?

    We frequently put 96 AmpliSeq libraries together on one 318 chip. Our method of quantitation is by qPCR. The Equalizer kit has been recommended to me on multiple occasions but I have not yet heard if it works well on multiplexed runs. We are at a point where qPCR is a huge bottleneck and we need to purchase another qPCR machine or figure something else out.

    Any insight or user experience is welcomed.
  • mikeg
    Member
    • Aug 2013
    • 13

    #2
    I would say to keep with your qPCR. I have tried the equalizer, and it is just too much of a black box for me. Doing 96 samples may be a bear, but you can rely on the qPCR data. Can't really say the same for the Equalizer!

    Comment

    • LindsayS
      Junior Member
      • Oct 2011
      • 4

      #3
      Thanks Mike. I have come to the same conclusion. Our new solution is a 384-well qPCR machine. So excited!

      Comment

      • mikeg
        Member
        • Aug 2013
        • 13

        #4
        Hi Lindsay,

        I see you are in Dallas? Where are you located?
        I see you are putting 96 libraries onto one chip, but what are your libraries of?
        Microbial?

        Comment

        • Xray1
          Junior Member
          • Jun 2015
          • 5

          #5
          Hi there,

          I would like to ask basically the same question as Lindsay.

          For a larger NGS project with quite a lot of samples but relatively few amplicons (AmpliSeq), I find the idea of the Equalizer kit quite attractive. I would like to pool at least 32 samples per run, possibly even 64 or 96. Question is uniformity of course.

          Does anyone here have some real life experience with it? Good or bad, any user experience is welcome.

          Comment

          • Élodie
            Junior Member
            • Nov 2012
            • 4

            #6
            I will plan to use the equalizer too because I found some variations on the qPCR for Ampliseq DNA libraries (custom primers). So do you?
            I tested several dilutions for one library and the calculated original concentration varies between dilutions. But I don't have this problem for other type of libraries (Exome, fragment plus)
            Did you note the same thing?

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • SEQadmin2
              Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
              by SEQadmin2



              Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
              ...
              07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
              by SEQadmin2



              Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

              There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
              07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
            • GATTACAT
              Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
              by GATTACAT
              Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
              07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:26 AM
            0 responses
            13 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
            0 responses
            26 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
            0 responses
            16 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
            0 responses
            33 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...