Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • anna_m
    Member
    • Jun 2013
    • 17

    Larger size TruSeq nano prep

    Hello,
    I followed the protocol for the 550bp size TruSeq nano library preparation but my final libraries were much larger than the expected 670bp average size (see attached pic).

    Has anyone else come across larger than expected libraries?
    Do you have any advice as to what may have happened?

    Thanks in advance,
    Anna.
    Attached Files
  • sweetph3
    Member
    • Jun 2013
    • 22

    #2
    I also saw a larger than expected product. I ran the Covaris to shear at 500 bp, and the final libraries had Bioanalyzer peaks at 780 bp. I don't have an explanation.

    Comment

    • barrmur
      Member
      • Nov 2009
      • 26

      #3
      Truseq pcr free libraries do run larger on a BA due to the tailed adapters but I have not seen this before with nano libraries. One explanation my be incomplete mixing of the size selection beads meaning that the incorrect amount of beads were added to the cleanup and a poor size selection. Might also be an idea to run the sheared samples on the BA before cleanup to check the size distribution from the shearing.

      Comment

      • anna_m
        Member
        • Jun 2013
        • 17

        #4
        Hello, I asked Illumina tech support and they said to try diluting the libraries as the chip looked to be overloaded. I made a 1 in 20 dilution and repeated the chip. An example of a trace is attached. The average size has gone down by around 100bp but it's still not the 670bp average stated in the manual. I have sent tech support these diluted library results and asked if they think they will sequence.

        Anna.
        Attached Files

        Comment

        • jpmirandam
          Junior Member
          • Jan 2013
          • 4

          #5
          I have the same problem. I make a change on the fragmentation protocol whit covaris (from a 550 pb insert to a 400 pb insert) but the mean size was almost the same (900 bp aprox.). I think that could be a problem on the size selection. Any help?. Thanks.

          Comment

          • anna_m
            Member
            • Jun 2013
            • 17

            #6
            Hello,
            It's a size selection issue. The protocol doesn't need to be altered, just make sure your SP beads are vortexed a lot (I mean a lot!). I usually mix them in between each sample prep as a pre-caution. Also we've found that the libraries run larger on the tapestation in comparison to the bioanalyser. Libraries usually look around 50bp larger on the tapestation. When the insert sizes are checked in the analysis stage, they are usually around the right size.

            All the best,
            Anna.

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • SEQadmin2
              Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
              by SEQadmin2


              I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

              Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
              06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
              by SEQadmin2


              Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


              The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
              ...
              06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
            0 responses
            36 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
            0 responses
            100 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
            0 responses
            121 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-04-2026, 08:59 AM
            0 responses
            113 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...