SEQanswers

Go Back   SEQanswers > Bioinformatics > Bioinformatics



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
RepeatMasker-help bioman1 Bioinformatics 1 09-30-2014 11:52 PM
Repeatmasker mainacio Illumina/Solexa 3 10-23-2013 07:41 AM
blast against Repbase using Repeatmasker or blast lran2008 Bioinformatics 1 08-16-2013 07:52 AM
BLAST+ creating custom blast database and using blast+ filtering features deniz Bioinformatics 2 10-26-2012 12:04 PM
BLAST database error - when changing to new BLAST+ local program biobio Bioinformatics 4 06-15-2011 06:20 AM

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-04-2014, 03:33 PM   #1
andreanna05
Junior Member
 
Location: Maryland

Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 4
Default RepeatMasker and BLAST

Hi all,

I am trying select sequences for capture enrichment using an unpublished genome of the same species available from NCBI as a reference. The reference genome seems to be pretty good quality (approximately right size, large scaffolds, etc).

I went through and picked my sequences of interest (~500kb), broke them up into ~100bp sequences, and then used BLASTn to see if there were any sequences that had multiple hits in the genome, and threw them out. I also BLASTed my selected sequences against themselves and threw out any that had multiple hits. Finally, I thought I would check these for low complexity regions, so I ran them through RepeatMasker online, selecting the most closely related species in the database. About 40% of my sequences were masked (~15% are LINE1).

RepeatMasker is obviously much more sensitive than BLAST, and repeats could potentially be more divergent than could be detected with BLASTn. But I would have thought I would have had more BLAST hits of my sequences to themselves or to the reference genome with such a large proportion being repetitive. Any thoughts about why this might be?
andreanna05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2014, 05:23 PM   #2
Brian Bushnell
Super Moderator
 
Location: Walnut Creek, CA

Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 2,695
Default

I'm not entirely sure what your question is, but my brief experience with RepeatMasker is that it masked WAY more than was necessary. And it was incredibly slow so I didn't want to have to re-run it repeatedly to get the desired result. As a result I had to write my own masking program, which can mask a genome for low-complexity regions and also regions covered by a sam file. To generate a sam file that will mask repeats, you can, for example, shred the genome into 100bp fragments (as you did), align them against the unshredded genome requiring high identity, then filter the sam file to only contain multi-mapping reads. Then it can be used as input to BBMask.

I don't know how RepeatMasker works, but I would investigate further before deciding to mask 40% of the genome. If BLAST can't even detect the homologies, why would you want to mask them as repeats? BLAST is very sensitive. Though of course it depends on what kind of identity threshold would start to interfere with your enrichment.
Brian Bushnell is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
blast, repeatmasker

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO