![]() |
|
|
#221 | |
|
--Site Admin--
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: SF Bay Area, CA, USA
Posts: 660
|
Quote:
Thanks! |
|
|
|
|
|
#222 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Nashville
Posts: 14
|
Thanks ECO for your kind suggestions.
Wuhoucdc |
|
|
|
|
#223 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: HK
Posts: 6
|
Seems that most of the softwares are available in Linux environment.
Are there any softwares recommended for use in Windows for RNA-seq or targeted sequencing projects? the data are obtained from Solexa, 454 and SoLID. Thanks for your help. |
|
|
|
|
#224 | |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Los Angeles, CA, USA
Posts: 659
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#225 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 220
|
Depends what you're trying to do - I've used Vancouver Short Read Analysis Package/FindPeaks (my own software) for RNA-Seq (alternative exon expression) and had good luck - I don't use it in windows, myself, but java is cross-platform and I know people have successfully used in that environment.
__________________
The more you know, the more you know you don't know. —Aristotle |
|
|
|
|
#226 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Posts: 125
|
There's also CLC Genomics Workbench (although it is a commercial package).
|
|
|
|
|
#227 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Davis, CA
Posts: 14
|
Yes, CLC Genomics Workbench will use all three data types. I use the program on Windows. However you will need lots of RAM. For my files/genomes I needed 32GB (the max we could put into my box). If you work with small bacterial genomes and simple transcriptomes you maybe able get away with 8GB RAM (the minimal requirement for CLC Workbench)
Marta |
|
|
|
|
#228 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Copenhagen
Posts: 15
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#229 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Davis, CA
Posts: 14
|
Stegger, thanks! Is is nice to know that CLC Workbench can run on a 3GB machine. How long are your 10M reads?
|
|
|
|
|
#230 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Copenhagen
Posts: 15
|
Their 36 bases.
|
|
|
|
|
#231 | ||
|
Wiki Master
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Dundee, Scotland
Posts: 94
|
Quote:
Quote:
http://seqanswers.com/wiki/Special:B...tural_variants ;-) |
||
|
|
|
|
#232 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Southwest Florida
Posts: 15
|
Sciguy, I notice that you last updated your list in August. Are there any significant changes since then? Or am I wrong about the reading of the update?
|
|
|
|
|
#233 | |
|
--Site Admin--
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: SF Bay Area, CA, USA
Posts: 660
|
Quote:
The data @ http://wiki.seqanswers.com is probably a bit more current as it's being maintained by the community rather than just sciguy and myself! |
|
|
|
|
|
#234 |
|
Wiki Master
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Dundee, Scotland
Posts: 94
|
I'm guessing we need some kind of wiki forum ... but I not sure what form... um?
I think the problem is that the wiki is so bad for threaded conversations, we need a place to discuss the wiki... For each software package that is in the wiki, I have added a link to search the forum for that package. This is only a small step. Generally I'm not sure how to more tightly integrate the two different approaches. |
|
|
|
|
#235 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: guangzhou city ,guangdong province ,china
Posts: 6
|
good thing thanks
|
|
|
|
|
#236 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: china
Posts: 10
|
nice work!
|
|
|
|
|
#237 |
|
--Site Admin--
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: SF Bay Area, CA, USA
Posts: 660
|
Locking this thread for now, as the wiki is easier to maintain and this thread seems to have outlived its usefulness.
If you have a question about a specific package...and have already searched for the answer, please start a new thread about it. |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|