Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • juckdnarocks
    Member
    • Sep 2012
    • 10

    PacBio ZMW Loading For Productivity

    Hi all,
    I recently constructed a 10k library and sequenced on RS II platform with P4 C2 chemistry, and got an abnormal result of ZMW loading for productivity with P0 74.22%, P1 13.48%, P2 12.3% and mean read length 1,324 bp, mean read quality 0.81.
    I refered to the help of smrt portal, which says
    "Productivity 0 (%): Percentage of ZMWs that are empty, with no polymerase.
    Productivity 1 (%): Percentage of ZMWs that are productive and sequencing.
    Productivity 2 (%): Percentage of ZMWs that are not P0 (empty) or P1 (productive). This may occur for a variety of reasons and the sequence data is not usable."

    But I still don't know the cause of the abnormal ZMW loading result.
    Does P0 means that ZMW has no polymerase loading or no template loading or contaminants deactivate the polymerase?
    Anther question is exactly what reasons for P2 occurring ?

    Could someone help to explain ? Thx very much.
  • GenoMax
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2008
    • 7142

    #2
    Loading of the ZMW's follows a poisson distribution. It generally results in ~40% of the wells loading with a single molecule (as you probably saw in the PacBio training materials). Basic idea is to maximize P1 while reducing P0 (no molecules/no signal) and P2 (more than one set of signal i.e. mixed sequence) as much as possible.

    You should consult with your local PacBio Field Application Scientist on figuring out how to increase the P1%. Though I do not work in the lab it is my understanding that this is somewhat an imprecise process that may require some trial and error.

    Comment

    • tacana
      Member
      • Feb 2011
      • 10

      #3
      From the information that you show, to me it looks like your cell was a bit underloaded. A P0 means that the instrument is not able to detect any signal on that ZMW. There are several reasons for this to occur, just like you noted this can happen if there is s no polymerase loaded or no template loaded or contaminants deactivate the polymerase. If contaminants are not an issue, increasing the on-plate concentration should improve the % P1.

      Good luck!

      Comment

      • juckdnarocks
        Member
        • Sep 2012
        • 10

        #4
        Originally posted by tacana View Post
        From the information that you show, to me it looks like your cell was a bit underloaded. A P0 means that the instrument is not able to detect any signal on that ZMW. There are several reasons for this to occur, just like you noted this can happen if there is s no polymerase loaded or no template loaded or contaminants deactivate the polymerase. If contaminants are not an issue, increasing the on-plate concentration should improve the % P1.

        Good luck!
        Thanks very much. But how to determine which contaminant deactivates the polymerase is the problem. Is possible to detect it? I am not familiar with experiment.

        Comment

        • tacana
          Member
          • Feb 2011
          • 10

          #5
          It is difficult to figure out which contaminants affects the Pacbio polymerase since many of these contaminants can be unique to an organism, growth conditions, DNA extraction method, etc.
          However, one way that can give you a hint that it is a contaminant issue is the distribution of ZMWs. For example, if you see a ZMW distribution pattern in which you have a percentage of P0 and P>1, and a low % of P1, then you should suspect contamination issues.

          Comment

          • MatDeclercq
            Junior Member
            • Jun 2014
            • 2

            #6
            As tacana mentioned, a rather high P0, low P1 and moderate P2 is quite often a signature of some contaminating compounds adhered to the SMRTbells.
            In your case p1 and p2 are almost similar, which makes it a bit borderline to tell.
            On the other hand, quality scores of 0.81 and especially mean read lengths of 1.3Kb are extremely poor for a P4 polymerase (if by mean RL you're talking about the mean polymerase RL and not mean Read of Insert size).
            In this case I would say you have a contaminant problem. Do you have any information on the DNA extraction method?

            Either way, a second run with double or triple the loading concentration will be the only way to be absolutely sure.
            If this does not improve p1 drastically, your last hope is a MagBead clean-up (available on samplenet) to try and get rid of the contaminant. But no guarantees there whatsoever...

            Good luck!

            Comment

            • raibiotech
              Junior Member
              • Jul 2014
              • 3

              #7
              hi,

              @ MatDeclercq
              As you mentioned :

              Either way, a second run with double or triple the loading concentration will be the only way to be absolutely sure.

              But as per Pacbio manual : They have fixed conc. on plate =0.015nM..

              How we can change that?
              Please suggest...

              Comment

              Latest Articles

              Collapse

              • SEQadmin2
                Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
                by SEQadmin2



                Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
                ...
                Today, 11:10 AM
              • SEQadmin2
                Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
                by SEQadmin2



                Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

                There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
                Yesterday, 05:17 AM
              • GATTACAT
                Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                by GATTACAT
                Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
                07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

              ad_right_rmr

              Collapse

              News

              Collapse

              Topics Statistics Last Post
              Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 10:04 AM
              0 responses
              8 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:08 AM
              0 responses
              6 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
              0 responses
              9 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
              0 responses
              31 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Working...