Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • nvteja
    Junior Member
    • Jan 2010
    • 5

    Reason for low quality of illumina reads

    HI All,

    Can anyone let me know why is it the case that the read quality is generally lower towards 3' end for solexa ?

    Thanks,
    Teja.
  • Torst
    Senior Member
    • Apr 2008
    • 275

    #2
    Originally posted by nvteja View Post
    Can anyone let me know why is it the case that the read quality is generally lower towards 3' end for solexa ?
    Put simply, the reads are synthesised base by base from the 5' end. Each step is error prone, hence errors accumulate. Each step makes the molecule longer and wobblier, making it hard to do image processing.

    Comment

    • SillyPoint
      Member
      • May 2008
      • 39

      #3
      Another phenomenon at work here is what Illumina calls 'phasing'. Remember that each cluster contains ~1000 (supposedly) identical molecules, all of which are undergoing reverse-strand synthesis.

      In a perfect world, the chemistry works perfectly, and at each cycle each molecule has one base+dye+blocker added, and has dye+blocker removed after imaging. In the real world, a small fraction of the molecules doesn't come out right: they miss a cycle, or get an extra (unblocked) base added.

      The cumulative effect of phasing over many cycles means that eventually the cluster has so many molecules out of sync that there is no clear base call possible, and miscalls start to happen. Quality scores, which are derived from the ratios of the intensities start to degrade. Eventually, you have to stop.

      --SP

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • GATTACAT
        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by GATTACAT
        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
        07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by SEQadmin2


        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
        06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
      0 responses
      14 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
      0 responses
      15 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
      0 responses
      20 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
      0 responses
      54 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...