SEQanswers

Go Back   SEQanswers > Sequencing Technologies/Companies > 454 Pyrosequencing



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Problems with 454 GS FLX Titanium medium volume sequencing BL82 454 Pyrosequencing 3 01-21-2011 05:08 AM
Error rates in 454 FLX/Titanium reads Marcus 454 Pyrosequencing 3 12-10-2010 11:11 AM
454 Roche Titanium Run Costs gendxdoc 454 Pyrosequencing 0 05-03-2010 03:41 PM
Discussion and explanation about Roche's 454 GS20 / FLX / Titanium?! edge 454 Pyrosequencing 1 10-05-2009 11:22 PM
Roche/454 Titanium Amplicon sequencing? robhall Sample Prep / Library Generation 7 09-01-2009 09:58 AM

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-27-2008, 05:28 PM   #1
ECO
--Site Admin--
 
Location: SF Bay Area, CA, USA

Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,352
Default Tech Summary: Roche's 454 GS20 / FLX / Titanium

There isn't anything here yet!

If you are interested in writing a tech summary, just post it below and I will rearrange the thread as appropriate.

Alternatively if anyone wants to post tech sheets, manuals, etc, I will write it. I just don't know enough of it beyond "pyrosequencing, picotiter plates, and a ton of beads".
ECO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2008, 07:02 AM   #2
Tom Bair
Member
 
Location: Iowa

Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 28
Default quick summary of titanium from 454 site

Needed this for something else may be incomplete or wrong but ..

400-600 million high-quality, filter-passed bases per run
10 hours
average length 400 bp
more than 1x10^6 reads

a cluster from roche is recommended for signal processing from www.pssclabs.com. It looks like image processing will still happen on the GS-FLX and 9G of cwf (wells) files need to go the the cluster

from what I can tell it is a 5 node system (20 cores) the only specs I can find say redhat with either openMPI or MPI2 (mpiexec), SunGrid as scheduler

runs will be 35GB (26GB images)

A test data-set with a configuration tester is promised soon

Rumor has it that bead breaking will be via centrifuge in the new protocol
Tom Bair is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2008, 10:58 AM   #3
genseq
Member
 
Location: Russia

Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 85
Default

It isn't Titanium, but it is about new pyrosequencing from Illumina:



Development of a 10Gb Pyrosequencer
Ronaghi, Mostafa
Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA
R01 HG003571
$5.1 million (3 years)

Collaborators: Helmy Eltoukhy, Stevan Jovanovich (Microchip Biotechnologies, Inc.)

We propose to develop a low-cost 10-Gb Pyrosequencer for de novo DNA sequencing that would enable any lab to perform high-throughput genome analyses. The platform implements automated sample preparation scheme combined with massive Pyrosequencing, which will potentially enable mammalian genome sequencing in a single run. A sensitive CMOS image sensor has been designed and fabricated specialized for Pyrosequencing chemistry, which is integrated with fluidic platform. Each well in the fluidic platform has a pixel on CMOS for detection of light signal generated from Pyrosequencing. The integrated chip will have a 2-megapixel CMOS, each pixel located on a single well enabling 2 million sequencing on each chip. Sixteen of such chips are set up on a board to develop a 32-million wells Pyrosequencer which potentially enable sequencing of more than 10 gigabase of genomic DNA. The raw data are immediately collected and assembled with our developed algorithms. We envision that the genome sequencing of mammalian genome to be reduced below $100,000 level for large-scale genome sequencing projects.
genseq is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2008, 01:32 PM   #4
bioinfosm
Senior Member
 
Location: USA

Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 482
Default

I am confused by this .. "pyrosequencing from illumina" !
bioinfosm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2008, 08:24 AM   #5
monad
Member
 
Location: California

Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 40
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bioinfosm View Post
I am confused by this .. "pyrosequencing from illumina" !
Confused here too.
Illmunia currently produces 15-20GB from single run of paired-end already.
Protocol will be available sometime early next year.
monad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2008, 08:32 AM   #6
ECO
--Site Admin--
 
Location: SF Bay Area, CA, USA

Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,352
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bioinfosm View Post
I am confused by this .. "pyrosequencing from illumina" !
Quote:
Originally Posted by monad View Post
Confused here too.
Illmunia currently produces 15-20GB from single run of paired-end already.
Protocol will be available sometime early next year.
They bought Avantome.
ECO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2009, 03:29 PM   #7
SeqWhiskey
Junior Member
 
Location: Denver, CO

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4
Default SV

Look out for the SV prep on titanium. There is a pretty serious typo under the DNA capture step. 3.2.7 the volume to evenly distribute capture beads is off. It says 40ul per rxn, it's really more like 70+ul. In fact completely ignore this section and prep each rxn in individual 1.7ml tubes. The roche tech agrees with me... just wash with 3-400ul of cap bead wash buff so you don't run out.... Then again, does Ti even work as advertised?
SeqWhiskey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2009, 10:55 PM   #8
edge
Senior Member
 
Location: China

Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 198
Default

Hi,

You have already summary out the tech of Roche's 454 GS20 / FLX / Titanium?
I interesting about it too

Quote:
Originally Posted by ECO View Post
There isn't anything here yet!

If you are interested in writing a tech summary, just post it below and I will rearrange the thread as appropriate.

Alternatively if anyone wants to post tech sheets, manuals, etc, I will write it. I just don't know enough of it beyond "pyrosequencing, picotiter plates, and a ton of beads".
edge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2010, 03:29 AM   #9
gstitan
Junior Member
 
Location: Essonne

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 7
Question Cangs

Does anybody already have to use CANGS? If yes he could explain to me why it filters primers sequences while this filter is already made by 454?
gstitan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2011, 06:30 AM   #10
scrosby
Director, GTAC, Washington U.
 
Location: St. Louis

Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 26
Default

With Illumina now going to 300bp, does there remain a viable role for 454?
scrosby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2011, 06:47 AM   #11
pmiguel
Senior Member
 
Location: Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana

Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,195
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by scrosby View Post
With Illumina now going to 300bp
link?

--
Phillip
pmiguel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2011, 06:58 AM   #12
scrosby
Director, GTAC, Washington U.
 
Location: St. Louis

Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 26
Default Forgive me...

I should have said 'soon' going to to 150 PE. Before the end of the year, I believe?
scrosby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2011, 07:10 AM   #13
pmiguel
Senior Member
 
Location: Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana

Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,195
Default

Actually, with the results I saw from recent v3 runs I was wondering if anyone had pushed out past 100 nt on HiSeq chemistry already?

--
Phillip
pmiguel is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO