Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Medhat
    Member
    • Jun 2013
    • 37

    Genome assembly Using Celera Assembler with corrected data from LoRDEC

    Hi,
    I corrected PacBio reads Using LoRDEC tool , now I have a corrected fasta file.
    My question,
    Can I use Celera Assembler with the corrected reads from LoRDEC to do assembly?
  • rhall
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2012
    • 324

    #2
    Yes, you should be able to treat them like any other accurate long read, i.e. sanger. What coverage do you have, raw pacbio, corrected pacbio. You will need ~15x corrected pacbio. If you have >35x raw pacbio I would also try going straight into canu https://github.com/marbl/canu

    Comment

    • Medhat
      Member
      • Jun 2013
      • 37

      #3
      Unfortunately the raw read coverage is low ~1x , so I can not go for canu.

      To run celera assembler

      runCA -d directory -p prefix myPacBio.frg

      How to create myPacBio.frg from corrected pacbio read that are fasta file no quality ;

      so do I need first to run something like this !!

      java -jar convertFastaAndQualToFastq.jar corrected_pacbio.fasta > corrected_pacbio.fastq

      then use fastqToCA like this:

      fastqToCA -libraryname MycorrectedPacBIo -technology pacbio-corrected -reads corrected_pacbio.fastq > ca.frg

      Or there is another solution

      Thanks a lot for help.

      Comment

      • rhall
        Senior Member
        • Aug 2012
        • 324

        #4
        It isn't possible to assemble 1x of data no matter what the error. Given the statistics of coverage much of the genome will not be sampled, i.e. 0 coverage.
        Even gap filling an existing assembly will require at least 5x, preferably closer to 15x. https://github.com/PacificBioscience...Bio-Long-Reads

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • GATTACAT
          Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by GATTACAT
          Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
          07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by SEQadmin2


          I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

          Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
          06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 11:05 AM
        0 responses
        6 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
        0 responses
        28 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
        0 responses
        25 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
        0 responses
        25 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...