Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • dladuswj
    Junior Member
    • Apr 2017
    • 1

    Problems of assembly polishing with RS_Resequencing.1 protocol

    Hi all,

    I’m experiencing a difficulty in getting a complete bacterial genome from PacBio sequencing data using the SMRT Analysis protocols.
    My usual workflow is as follows:
    De novo assembly by HGAP2 ->Circularization by circlator or minimus -> Polishing by RS_Resequencing.1 protocol until no variants are detected.
    This workflow has worked nicely. Usually, repeating RS_Resequencing several times resulted in 100.0% of Consensus Concordance and no variants.

    But, for a new bacterial genome we sequenced recently, the result of RS_Resequencing is different from usual. During repeating the RS_Resequencing 8 times, variants have been detected continuously at 10-20 positions and Consensus Concordance never reached 100.0%. At some positions, 1-bp insertion occurred repeatedly per each resequencing.


    In my opinion, it seems that more repetition of RS_Resequencing would not be helpful.
    What should I do to solve this problem?
    Does anyone have a similar experience?

    Thanks in advance!
  • gconcepcion
    Member
    • Dec 2010
    • 68

    #2
    Hi dladuswj,

    It seems likely that the bacterial genome that you are sequencing contains more/longer homopolymer/repetitive regions than the typical genomes you are sequencing, which could result in further iterations of the Resequencing algorithm "failing to converge" on a 100% consensus.

    You should investigate the alignments at the particular areas where the variants are being called to determine what is causing the variant calling to differ from round to round.

    Comment

    • rhall
      Senior Member
      • Aug 2012
      • 324

      #3
      It is possible that the data is from a population that is not perfectly clonal. This happens frequently in slow growing organisms, or things that mutate rapidly.

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • GATTACAT
        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by GATTACAT
        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
        Yesterday, 11:43 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by SEQadmin2


        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
        06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
        by SEQadmin2


        Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


        The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
        ...
        06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
      0 responses
      11 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
      0 responses
      18 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
      0 responses
      52 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
      0 responses
      111 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...