Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • crom
    Junior Member
    • Jan 2016
    • 5

    troubles with Radseq library preparation

    Hello all,

    I am preparing a library of a selected number of specimens (20 ind) following the ddRad seq protocol (Peterson et al. 2013). I am having difficulties because I start with 500ng of Dna but I loose so much DNA that I end to get very low concentration before the final PCR.
    In particular I loose more than 50% of DNA every beads wash or pooling. I using a concentration of 3X beads. Do you know if I am supposed to loose so much?
    How many max PCR cycles may I run whitout increasing the PCR errors?

    thank you
  • nucacidhunter
    Jafar Jabbari
    • Jan 2013
    • 1250

    #2
    50% loss is too much; an acceptable loss is 10-15% and 3x bead is also excessive. You are using too much DNA to start with so if you go to PCR (multiple 20 ul reactions) with 2 ng of adapted size selected tags and 5% is amplifiable then up to 12 cycle should produce more than enough library for QC and sequencing.

    Comment

    • crom
      Junior Member
      • Jan 2016
      • 5

      #3
      Originally posted by nucacidhunter View Post
      50% loss is too much; an acceptable loss is 10-15% and 3x bead is also excessive. You are using too much DNA to start with so if you go to PCR (multiple 20 ul reactions) with 2 ng of adapted size selected tags and 5% is amplifiable then up to 12 cycle should produce more than enough library for QC and sequencing.
      thank you for answering, I supposed that it was too much loss, but I do not know how to reduce it. Actually I am using more beads (3X) to reduce the loss but it is not working. I beleive it is related to the nature of digested samples because with other type of samples and the same beads I do not get so much loss. Any suggestions? otherwise 12 cycles will be not enough for my samples

      Comment

      • nucacidhunter
        Jafar Jabbari
        • Jan 2013
        • 1250

        #4
        If digestable DNA fragments mostly are over 2kb, with standard clean up protocol loss might be higher. The quantity of Pippin size selected DNA is more important than loss and 10-20 ng recovery at the end should be enough. I normally do 12 cycles of PCR but I do not think that 13 cycle would cause any bias.

        Comment

        • crom
          Junior Member
          • Jan 2016
          • 5

          #5
          After the Pippin site selection I have a concentration of 1.4 ng/ul, do you think I can do two runs of PCR (each of 20 ul and with 13 cycles) and than pool the PCR products 20+20ul?

          Comment

          • nucacidhunter
            Jafar Jabbari
            • Jan 2013
            • 1250

            #6
            I Wonder how many ul of 1.4 you have and what was the total quantity of input DNA.

            Comment

            • crom
              Junior Member
              • Jan 2016
              • 5

              #7
              At the end after Pippin (before PCR) I have 30ul of 1.4 ul solution (for a total 42ng) that is a pool of 4 samples, originally I started with a total of 2300 ng...as you can see I loose so much DNA along the way, is it normal?

              Comment

              • nucacidhunter
                Jafar Jabbari
                • Jan 2013
                • 1250

                #8
                It seems OK. Final DNA recovery from Pippin depends on the quantity of fragments in the selected size range which will vary based on input, genome composition and restriction enzymes used among other factors.

                I think you can safely set up four 20 ul reactions using 5 ul of size selected tags per reaction and do 12 cycles. After 12 cycle you can check the PCR yield and size by TapeStation if it is available or at least check concentration with Qubit or PicoGreen. If PCR yield is around 1 ug/ul then no extra cycles would be needed. If it is lower then do 1 or 2 more cycles considering that each cycle yield will double.

                Comment

                • crom
                  Junior Member
                  • Jan 2016
                  • 5

                  #9
                  Thank you very much nucacidhunter!
                  just to be clear: do you mean I can do different reactions and than pool the yields?

                  If the quantity is not enough may I use the PCR product (add again polymerase, NTP and so on) and re-run the PCR for extra run?

                  thanks again

                  Comment

                  • nucacidhunter
                    Jafar Jabbari
                    • Jan 2013
                    • 1250

                    #10
                    PCR yield should be enough but it would depend on the amplifiable portion of size selected tags. It is better to do more cycles than re-amplifying PCR product because standard ddRAD does not include UMIs for identifying PCR duplicates and also it will affect allele frequency. 50 ng final library should be enough for QC and sequencing.

                    Edit: For extra 1-2 cycles there is no need for reagent addition. Just keep the reaction at 4 C while quantifying yield.
                    Last edited by nucacidhunter; 08-18-2017, 10:41 AM.

                    Comment

                    • cbird
                      Member
                      • May 2012
                      • 10

                      #11
                      some suggestions:

                      Minimize tube transfers

                      Use the with bead method to reuse beads https://genomebiology.biomedcentral....b-2011-12-1-r1

                      don't throw out supernatant, then you can see if that's where your DNA is going by running it on a gel or fragment analyzer

                      if you have to do a transfer, elute the DNA from beads twice with smaller volume rather than once with larger volume

                      good luck

                      Comment

                      Latest Articles

                      Collapse

                      • SEQadmin2
                        From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
                        by SEQadmin2


                        Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


                        The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
                        ...
                        06-02-2026, 10:05 AM
                      • SEQadmin2
                        Single-Cell Sequencing at an Inflection Point: Early Impacts of New Platforms and Emerging Trends
                        by SEQadmin2


                        With the launch of new single-cell sequencing platforms in 2026, the field stands at an exciting inflection point. This article surveys the most impactful advances in the field and discusses how they’re reshaping research in cancer, immunology, and beyond.


                        Introduction

                        Single-cell sequencing technologies have undergone remarkable advances over the past decade, transitioning from low-throughput experimental approaches to highly scalable platforms capable of...
                        05-22-2026, 06:42 AM
                      • SEQadmin2
                        Environmental Genomics in the Age of NGS: From Microbes to Conservation Strategies
                        by SEQadmin2

                        Studying ecosystems means dealing with complex, multi-species communities that are hard to observe at scale. This complexity, however, hides many important questions to be answered, from how biogeochemical cycles work and how climate change can affect species distribution to how conservation strategies can work best.


                        Genomics, particularly since the expansion of NGS, has transformed ecosystem ecology. By sequencing environmental DNA, we can now assess biodiversity without direct...
                        05-06-2026, 09:04 AM

                      ad_right_rmr

                      Collapse

                      News

                      Collapse

                      Topics Statistics Last Post
                      Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 08:59 AM
                      0 responses
                      13 views
                      0 reactions
                      Last Post SEQadmin2  
                      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-02-2026, 12:03 PM
                      0 responses
                      21 views
                      0 reactions
                      Last Post SEQadmin2  
                      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-02-2026, 11:40 AM
                      0 responses
                      19 views
                      0 reactions
                      Last Post SEQadmin2  
                      Started by SEQadmin2, 05-28-2026, 11:40 AM
                      0 responses
                      31 views
                      0 reactions
                      Last Post SEQadmin2  
                      Working...