Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Meyana
    Member
    • Sep 2017
    • 40

    Add user specified reads to fastq to validate analysis method?

    Hi,

    I am analyzing mtDNA and am looking for indels, especially I am hoping to catch some large deletions.
    I have performed 150bp PE on MiSeq using NexteraXT library prep.

    Using different tools, I am not able to pick up the large deletions I was hoping, however, I am seeing a lot of small indels and substitution mutations, which I also was expecting.

    To test my analysis methods, I would like to add some "in silico" generated reads to my fastq files. I am hoping to make 'reads' that cross a large deletions (i.e. the first 75bp of read1 at position 1-75 of mtDNA and the last 75bp and position 1001-1075 of mtDNA, read2 maybe something like position 1275-1201 [i.e. not split up at different genomic position]).

    How would I go about manipulating my data in such a way?

    I hope my question in clear...

    Thanks!
  • Meyana
    Member
    • Sep 2017
    • 40

    #2
    Anyone that might know how to do something like this?

    Comment

    • dylanfofylan
      Junior Member
      • Dec 2016
      • 3

      #3
      Hi Meyena,

      Last year, I wrote a short python script to fabricate fastq data for validating software functions. Here's my very (very) simple implementation: https://github.com/dfox3/fabricate_f...icate_fastq.py

      You provide a filename (--o) (to overwrite, not to append to), the DNA code you want to to fabricate (--i), and how many times you want to replicate it (--d).

      If you're interested in running this function on a set of sequences, I'd consider expanding on it. I'll probably need to use this again in the future.

      Hope you find this useful
      -dylan
      Last edited by dylanfofylan; 05-16-2018, 12:34 PM. Reason: i didnt want to mislead

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • SEQadmin2
        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by SEQadmin2


        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
        06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
        by SEQadmin2


        Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


        The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
        ...
        06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
      0 responses
      10 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
      0 responses
      45 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
      0 responses
      105 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
      0 responses
      125 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...