Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • CsprsSassyHrly
    Junior Member
    • Jul 2018
    • 2

    python blastxml_to_tabular.py

    Good afternoon, all. I am relatively new to bioinformatics and am running into an error when I try to convert my xml file to a tabular file. I have used this command line before and didn't have any problems with it, but for some reason, I just can't get these files to be converted.

    Command line used:
    python blastxml_to_tabular.py -o P_jeffreysii_agatoxin.tab -c ext P_jeffreysii_agatoxin.xml

    This is the error that pops up after I hit enter:
    Problem splitting multuple hits?
    'tr_E9FSX5_Daphnia_pul_Cru_Bra'
    --> list index out of range

    I have checked, I am in the folders I'm supposed to be in, I've got the xml to tabular converter file with the xml file. There doesn't seem to be anything glaringly obviously wrong on the fasta file from the database. And I do have results on the xml files. But this is an error I get on every file I try to convert from xml to tabular that is run against this one database, except each time, it's a different sequence.

    I have googled the bananas out of this error and I have yet to find something that is helpful because they're all the "out of range" error but with different programs.

    Since I am pretty new, I'm hoping someone can help me understand what this error means and how I can fix it.

    Thank you in advance!

    Irene
  • neavemj
    Member
    • Feb 2014
    • 58

    #2
    Hi Irene,

    That error is because python is trying to get the second item in a list but the list only contains one item. Looking at the code (line 299), it appears that the script is trying to make a list from the hit definition by splitting is apart at the ">" symbol.

    As you can see from the output, that particular hit 'tr_E9FSX5_Daphnia_pul_Cru_Bra' does not contain a ">" symbol, and, therefore, the resulting list only contains this single item.

    Basically I think the input is just not in the correct format for this script. You could probably change the code a bit to get it to run but perhaps easiest would be to generate another input format? This help is provided in the script:

    # Expecting either this,
    # <Hit_id>gi|3024260|sp|P56514.1|OPSD_BUFBU</Hit_id>
    # <Hit_def>RecName: Full=Rhodopsin</Hit_def>
    # <Hit_accession>P56514</Hit_accession>
    # or,
    # <Hit_id>Subject_1</Hit_id>
    # <Hit_def>gi|57163783|ref|NP_001009242.1| rhodopsin [Felis catus]</Hit_def>
    # <Hit_accession>Subject_1</Hit_accession>
    #
    # apparently depending on the parse_deflines switch
    #
    # Or, with a local database not using -parse_seqids can get this,
    # <Hit_id>gnl|BL_ORD_ID|2</Hit_id>
    # <Hit_def>chrIII gi|240255695|ref|NC_003074.8| Arabidopsis
    # thaliana chromosome 3, complete sequence</Hit_def>
    # <Hit_accession>2</Hit_accession>

    Cheers,

    Matt.

    Comment

    • CsprsSassyHrly
      Junior Member
      • Jul 2018
      • 2

      #3
      Thank you for your reply, Matt. I guess that's what I'm finding strange... The xml file is being generated using the same BLAST command line that I have used before and haven't had this issue... the only thing I am changing is the query and the database.

      The only thing that is really different is that the fasta file I turned into a database, was converted from a philip file into a fasta file before being turned into a database, while the other files I have turned into a database were downloaded as fasta files from Uniprot. I'll keep playing with it and see if I can figure it out!

      Thanks again,

      Irene

      Comment

      • neavemj
        Member
        • Feb 2014
        • 58

        #4
        Hmm, yep might need a bit of digging. It does seem that the script is requiring headers that look like NCBI / uniprot, e.g:

        <Hit_id>gi|3024260|sp|P56514.1|OPSD_BUFBU</Hit_id>

        Perhaps when you go from phylip to fasta, this header information is lost? You could also open up your xml file and compare the hit information to an xml file that you know works..

        Good luck!

        Matt.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
          by SEQadmin2



          Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
          ...
          Today, 11:10 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
          by SEQadmin2



          Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

          There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
          Yesterday, 05:17 AM
        • GATTACAT
          Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by GATTACAT
          Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
          07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 10:04 AM
        0 responses
        7 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:08 AM
        0 responses
        6 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
        0 responses
        9 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
        0 responses
        31 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...