Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jmartin
    Member
    • Dec 2009
    • 78

    mapping V1V3 region 16s to a database of V1V3+V3V5 region 16s

    There is a table of 'most wanted genomes' (MWGs) from the Human Microbiome project that lists the 2698 organisms that the community generally thinks would be useful to have genome sequence. The table includes the consensus sequence of the V1V3 and/or V3V5 region of the 16s for each of these wanted organisms.

    Locally I have a collection of 16s V1V3 region sequences that I would like to map to those MWG 16s regions but I am having trouble with the mapping. My initial attempt was to use ncbi blast to align the 16s regions of the MWGs to a database of my own 16s V1V3 regions. But I am seeing many of my local 16s sequences appearing as the strong, tophit for multiple of these MWGs. And I am getting 'strong' (by evalue) hits to almost every single MWG in the HMP collection, which is not what I had expected. Even when I filter the alignments to require (I think?) species level similarity of 97% across 90% of the query length I am still getting a fair number of my local 16s sequences mapping as the best hit to multiple MWGs. So basically I think my approach is too simplistic.

    Could someone suggest a good way to do this? My goal is to get an idea of how many of these MWGs I have represented in my local collection of 16s sequences.

    Thanks,
    John Martin

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • GATTACAT
    Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by GATTACAT
    Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
    07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by SEQadmin2


    I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

    Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
    06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:05 AM
0 responses
7 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
0 responses
28 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
0 responses
27 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
0 responses
27 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...