Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • flxlex
    Moderator
    • Nov 2008
    • 412

    REM e for more than two-lane plates

    Hi,

    I previously started a thread on the REM e module for emPCR Enrichment here: http://seqanswers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2916, but decided to start a new for this question.

    We now have the REM e running on the Hamilton, and it seems to work. However, we had to go through a lot of rounds with 454/Hamilton to get the protocols for 4-lane, 8-lane and 16-lane plates installed. We have been told nobody uses the REM e for 16-lane plates. Is this true? Are we the only crazy ones who are still doing this? Or rather, were doing this (we just decided to run 8 lanes max).
  • kmcarr
    Senior Member
    • May 2008
    • 1181

    #2
    flx,

    We don't have a REM e but we completely stopped doing 16 region gaskets simply for practical reasons. They leak terribly and the loss of usable picotiter plate wells is simply too great. We will occasionally do 8 region runs for a submitter doing amplicons (he submits 8 multiplexed pools at a time) but otherwise stick to 4 or 2 region runs, using multiplexing to combine more samples. Multiplexing is far more efficient than running the multiple region gaskets.

    Comment

    • flxlex
      Moderator
      • Nov 2008
      • 412

      #3
      Sure, we mulitiplex. But the 16 lanes were for amplicons, just like your 8 lane runs. We just informed our biggest user of 16 lane runs, and they are a bit pissed because of the necessary redesign we now force upon them in the middle of their data collection. Need to talk to them...

      But leaky 16 lane gaskets is not something we experience...
      Last edited by flxlex; 01-05-2011, 01:48 AM. Reason: typo

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • GATTACAT
        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by GATTACAT
        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
        07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by SEQadmin2


        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
        06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
      0 responses
      18 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
      0 responses
      19 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
      0 responses
      21 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
      0 responses
      54 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...