Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • sobbewoscht
    Junior Member
    • May 2019
    • 1

    Check transposon activity

    Hi all,

    We are working with the Nextera Tagmentation Library Kit on 3 kb PCR products, to eventually pool libraries of 96 PCR reactions for a MiSeq run.

    Tagmentation is done by plainly adding the enzyme + buffer to a dilution of the PCR reaction (no purification).

    This generally works very well. However, for my last two library preps, my bioanalyzer traces ended up with a large peak at 3 kb (likely the original input), and nearly nothing in the 300-450 bp range.

    This makes me believe that tagmentation was not effective.

    Two potential culprits:

    1) New PCR buffer (NEB Phusion HF Buffer) that includes detergent. Might not have been diluted enough and could have inhibited the transposon (final dilution of PCR buffer during tagmentation step was 1:25).


    2) Loss of transposon activity. Kit technically expired six months ago; and it was accidentally thawed for several hours a few months ago. But we used it successfully after this accidental thaw.


    I was thinking about an easy way to confirm that transposon activity is still there (without having immediate access to a bioanalyzer):

    Purify PCR product > Tagmentation step according to Nextera protocol > Check whether the PCR band (ca. 3 kb) is gone (i.e., only smear or nothing detectable left).

    Would that make sense to identify a loss in enzyme activity? Or would we not expect full tagmentation (i.e., complete loss of the 3 kb bnad) even for "fresh" enzyme.


    Thanks!
  • nucacidhunter
    Jafar Jabbari
    • Jan 2013
    • 1250

    #2
    I would suggest to do a reaction according to standard protocol from start to end and check the resulting library. Tagmented DNA will not migrate according to size becuase:
    1- transposon will be engaged with DNA and slow its migration speed
    2- presence of salts in the buffer

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • SEQadmin2
      Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by SEQadmin2


      I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.


      Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
      06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
      by SEQadmin2


      Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


      The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
      ...
      06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
    0 responses
    25 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
    0 responses
    42 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
    0 responses
    48 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-04-2026, 08:59 AM
    0 responses
    49 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...