Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • 100%Wool
    Junior Member
    • Feb 2020
    • 1

    #1

    iSeq 100 user new here

    Hi Folks,
    iSeq 100 user here, checking in!
    May all your runs be bountiful
    Wool.
  • Zed
    Junior Member
    • May 2020
    • 1

    #2
    Hi Everyone, We acquired this machine recently. we are resource-limited researchers and want to sequence the CoV-2 genome from a limited number of patients. How many iseq cartridges will be needed per sample, if we use Enrichment Sequencing by Spiked Primer MSSPE method?

    Comment

    • jjimenez
      Junior Member
      • Aug 2023
      • 2

      #3
      Hello Everyone,
      I know this thread is quite old, but wanted to know how has your experience been so far with the iSeq 100?

      We have only performed one run, and although Q30 was quite good for the Read 1 and 2, the indexes were read with lower Q30, even though we had a good balance of bases in each cycle (checked after the run in basespace).

      I was wondering if there were other tips to improve Q30 during indexing? It's a shame to lose good reads due to poor indexing

      Comment

      • Ben3
        Member
        • Sep 2022
        • 79

        #4
        jjimenez I would imagine that the only way to improve the Q30 for index reads is to further increase the index complexity or add more PhiX. You said you had a good balance but I wondered if there was a way you further increase the diversity of these bases.

        Comment

        • jjimenez
          Junior Member
          • Aug 2023
          • 2

          #5
          Click image for larger version

Name:	Imx12.png
Views:	310
Size:	737.6 KB
ID:	324914
          OK,
          So this was not the greatest SeqRun, a lot of short fragments that give rise to the Poly-Gs you see after Cycle 120 (clearly, we have to be more stringent with the size selection). Going back to the Q30 metrics

          Read 1: 92.75% >Q30
          Read 2: 82.71% >Q30
          Read 3: 79.38% >Q30
          Read 4: 90.02% >Q30


          During the indexing reads, no base goes above 40% representantion. I wouldn't think its a diversity issue? And PhiX wouldn't help, since its not indexed (unless we get the indexed one from other sources, but I dont think we'll do that)

          The run was a bit underloaded though (82% ocupation), I wonder if that has any effect.

          Comment

          • Ben3
            Member
            • Sep 2022
            • 79

            #6
            jjimenez you're right, for some reason, I kept thinking PhiX adds to the index diversity but it doesn't. Although having a slightly underloaded run shouldn't cause this issue either. I haven't run anything on the iSeq yet, but whenever I had this problem on the NextSeq, I would just spike in other libraries for additional diversity. I know that doesn't answer your question but it seemed to help.

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • SEQadmin2
              Beyond CRISPR/Cas9: Understand, Choose, and Use the Right Genome Editing Tool
              by SEQadmin2



              CRISPR/Cas9 sparked the gene editing revolution for both research and therapeutics.1 But this system still showed severe issues that limited its applications. The most prominent were the heavy reliance on PAM sequences, delivery limitations, double-stranded breaks that prompt unintended edits and cell death, and editing inefficiency (both in targeting and in knock-in reliability).

              Despite this, “CRISPR helped turn genome editing from a specialized technique into
              ...
              07-31-2026, 11:01 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
              by SEQadmin2


              Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

              The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
              ...
              07-20-2026, 11:48 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, 08-06-2026, 07:41 AM
            0 responses
            15 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 08-03-2026, 10:13 AM
            0 responses
            31 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-31-2026, 02:55 AM
            0 responses
            41 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-24-2026, 12:17 PM
            0 responses
            26 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...