Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • lingfung.tang
    Member
    • Dec 2010
    • 10

    Exome sequencing with Illumina Kit

    I was preparing the 2nd hybridization step of an exome sequencing project. But I mixed up the target elution buffer and the target capture buffer, and used the wrong one (i.e. I used the elution buffer to do the capture). In trying to get back the captured DNA sample, I extracted it with AMPure Beads and run a DNA 1000 chip with the sample. Unfortunately, from the result, I could not find any DNA > 200bp. There is only one sharp band with 20ng/ul at 100-150bp. I suppose that is the target capture oligo I put in the reaction for 2nd hybridization. I also saved the 'wash waste' from AMPure Beads, and found no DNA in it with DNA 1000 chips. I do not understand why AMPure Beads can save the oligos but not the captured library. Do you know if I have any chance I can find back my capture library?

    On the other hand, I continue the 2nd hyb with the DNA I extracted from AMPure Beads, are they safe to be kept at -20C before the wash?

    Thanks!
    Last edited by lingfung.tang; 02-13-2011, 12:26 PM.
  • csoong
    Member
    • Jun 2009
    • 74

    #2
    I never worked with Illumina's exome kit (only Sureselect) but sounds like the capture step failed due to the elution buffer, the bait never binded with the DNA targets. Or if it did, the AMPURE step failed due to the initial presence of elution buffer.

    Also, it's hard to imagine how AMPURE beads could pull down any DNA with elution buffer mixed materials to start with. Just my thoughts may be wrong.

    Comment

    • lingfung.tang
      Member
      • Dec 2010
      • 10

      #3
      Thanks. But the AMPure Bead can pull down the target capture oligos

      Comment

      • csoong
        Member
        • Jun 2009
        • 74

        #4
        With Sureselect after the capture step there is a magentic streptavidin-biotin pull down I think that might be a step you had run trouble into (if Illumina also has a streptavidin-biotin pull magnetic bead pull down).
        Do you think that's the case?

        Comment

        • lingfung.tang
          Member
          • Dec 2010
          • 10

          #5
          possible. but how things can go wrong with that case?

          Comment

          • csoong
            Member
            • Jun 2009
            • 74

            #6
            my guess is the elution buffer cause the DNA to dissolve in solution instead of binding with the biotinylated baits. So AMPURE only purified the magnetic beads that contained the baits as you thought. But then the question is why are the baits being purified? They are certainly not just single stranded DNA. They are supposed to be biotinylated RNA right? would it still end up as a single band around 150 bp? I do not know...

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • GATTACAT
              Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
              by GATTACAT
              Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
              Yesterday, 11:43 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
              by SEQadmin2


              I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

              Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
              06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
              by SEQadmin2


              Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


              The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
              ...
              06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
            0 responses
            9 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
            0 responses
            18 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
            0 responses
            52 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
            0 responses
            110 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...