Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Error during PicardMarkDuplicates (Illumina paired-ends mapped by Bfast)

    I mapped one run of Illumina paired end reads by using Bfast (bwaaln + localalign + postprocess), then converted it to bam, performed the Picard AddOrReplaceReadGroups command plus Samtools sort/index and therefore, when executing Picard MarkDuplicates, I have the following error:

    Code:
    Exception in thread "main" net.sf.picard.PicardException: Value was put into PairInfoMap more than once.  3: grouped_reads:HWUSI-EAS1692_0001:1:1:1841:8839#0
        at net.sf.picard.sam.CoordinateSortedPairInfoMap.ensureSequenceLoaded(CoordinateSortedPairInfoMap.java:124)
        at net.sf.picard.sam.CoordinateSortedPairInfoMap.remove(CoordinateSortedPairInfoMap.java:78)
        at net.sf.picard.sam.DiskReadEndsMap.remove(DiskReadEndsMap.java:61)
        at net.sf.picard.sam.MarkDuplicates.buildSortedReadEndLists(MarkDuplicates.java:285)
        at net.sf.picard.sam.MarkDuplicates.doWork(MarkDuplicates.java:113)
        at net.sf.picard.cmdline.CommandLineProgram.instanceMain(CommandLineProgram.java:157)
        at net.sf.picard.sam.MarkDuplicates.main(MarkDuplicates.java:97)
    I've noticed that the reads outputted by the bfast-postprocess looks like HWUSI-EAS1692_0001:2:1:1025:14826#0, whereas the original reads indicates the pair-end by either HWUSI-EAS1692_0001:2:1:1025:14826#0/1 or HWUSI-EAS1692_0001:2:1:1025:14826#0/2, I guess it is related, but I do not know how to solve this.

    Any help will be appreciated, many thanks in advance!

    David

  • #2
    Could you create a test case with only the offending reads (in SAM format)?

    Comment


    • #3
      I've created a file just with the reads pointed out in the MarkDuplicates error, and the same message error appears when running the Picard command. Also, I've created a SAM file with only these reads removed and the same error appears but with another read ID. I would say that MarkDuplicates does not allow more than one mapped position per read in the input file, therefore, I've forced just an unique alignement per read in the bfast postprocess command by changing the value of the "-a" argument:

      previously, the command was:

      Code:
      bfast postprocess -i  input.baf -f hg19.fa -a 0 -A 0 -R -O 1 -n 4 -U >  output.sam
      I changed it to:

      Code:
      bfast postprocess -i  input.baf -f hg19.fa -a 3 -z -A 0 -R -O 1 -n 4 -U >  output.sam
      Now the Picard MarkDuplicates command works fine. Hope it makes sense.

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • seqadmin
        Advancing Precision Medicine for Rare Diseases in Children
        by seqadmin




        Many organizations study rare diseases, but few have a mission as impactful as Rady Children’s Institute for Genomic Medicine (RCIGM). “We are all about changing outcomes for children,” explained Dr. Stephen Kingsmore, President and CEO of the group. The institute’s initial goal was to provide rapid diagnoses for critically ill children and shorten their diagnostic odyssey, a term used to describe the long and arduous process it takes patients to obtain an accurate...
        12-16-2024, 07:57 AM
      • seqadmin
        Recent Advances in Sequencing Technologies
        by seqadmin



        Innovations in next-generation sequencing technologies and techniques are driving more precise and comprehensive exploration of complex biological systems. Current advancements include improved accessibility for long-read sequencing and significant progress in single-cell and 3D genomics. This article explores some of the most impactful developments in the field over the past year.

        Long-Read Sequencing
        Long-read sequencing has seen remarkable advancements,...
        12-02-2024, 01:49 PM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by seqadmin, 12-17-2024, 10:28 AM
      0 responses
      33 views
      0 likes
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Started by seqadmin, 12-13-2024, 08:24 AM
      0 responses
      49 views
      0 likes
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Started by seqadmin, 12-12-2024, 07:41 AM
      0 responses
      34 views
      0 likes
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Started by seqadmin, 12-11-2024, 07:45 AM
      0 responses
      46 views
      0 likes
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Working...
      X