With the price of next gen sequencing being as low as it is now, often whole runs are used for single experiments to answer specific questions. After this is done, the quesiton of 'what else can we do with the data?' comes up. (Or, and unfortunately this is becoming more common, there is no specific question at all before sequencing, it's done 'just to see what comes out of it'.) As a bioinformatician you then get a load of transcriptome reads, and that question.
What do you do in that case? Especially for non-model organisms, where you don't have a genome to map to?
The most obvious steps are assembly and blastx, maybe with GO annoation using something like Blast2GO. RNA-Seq is also possible, but of limited use without a comparison. Maybe one can find highly expressed genes that don't have a blast match anywhere and are thus interesting.
What are other ideas for 'exploratory analysis' of non-model organism transcriptomes?
What do you do in that case? Especially for non-model organisms, where you don't have a genome to map to?
The most obvious steps are assembly and blastx, maybe with GO annoation using something like Blast2GO. RNA-Seq is also possible, but of limited use without a comparison. Maybe one can find highly expressed genes that don't have a blast match anywhere and are thus interesting.
What are other ideas for 'exploratory analysis' of non-model organism transcriptomes?
Comment