Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Rivalyn
    Member
    • Apr 2014
    • 14

    Chipseq and statistical models

    I was wondering a bit about the statistical models used by peak-calling software and how they compare to the models normally employed by packages designed for RNAseq. It's my understanding that most RNAseq tools for differential expression analysis. The way I understand a negative binomial distribution is that it's a lot like a Poisson distribution, except that a negative binomial distribution takes into account the fact that the mean/variance won't be equal across biological replicates.

    From what I've read, some Chipseq tools use the negative binomial distribution, while others use the Hidden Markov Model (HMM). I read the wikipedia entry on HMM and found it... less than clear. The way I understand it, a Markov model refers to a series of discrete "states", where each state depends upon the previous state in a non-deterministic way. So, for example, a tree might be classified as "small", "medium" or "large". That tree has to go through the "medium" state before it can reach the "large" state, but just because a tree is "medium" doesn't mean it will ever become "large". The size of the tree is related to how rainy it was on a previous year, so if it was exceptionally rainy, there might be a 70% chance that the tree you observe will be large. When refering to a Hidden Markov Model, you refer to a Markov chain in which some of the states are hidden, or unobserved. So to use the tree example, if you didn't have the weather data for the previous year, you'd have to infer how rainy it was based upon how many "large" trees you observe.

    Assuming that understanding isn't completely wrong, I don't really see how it applies to Chipseq. Can someone explain to me why this model is used in Chipseq analysis, and why some tools use negative binomial distribution instead?
    Last edited by Rivalyn; 05-27-2014, 05:50 AM.

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • seqadmin
    Pathogen Surveillance with Advanced Genomic Tools
    by seqadmin




    The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the need for proactive pathogen surveillance systems. As ongoing threats like avian influenza and newly emerging infections continue to pose risks, researchers are working to improve how quickly and accurately pathogens can be identified and tracked. In a recent SEQanswers webinar, two experts discussed how next-generation sequencing (NGS) and machine learning are shaping efforts to monitor viral variation and trace the origins of infectious...
    03-24-2025, 11:48 AM
  • seqadmin
    New Genomics Tools and Methods Shared at AGBT 2025
    by seqadmin


    This year’s Advances in Genome Biology and Technology (AGBT) General Meeting commemorated the 25th anniversary of the event at its original venue on Marco Island, Florida. While this year’s event didn’t include high-profile musical performances, the industry announcements and cutting-edge research still drew the attention of leading scientists.

    The Headliner
    The biggest announcement was Roche stepping back into the sequencing platform market. In the years since...
    03-03-2025, 01:39 PM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by seqadmin, 03-20-2025, 05:03 AM
0 responses
49 views
0 reactions
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 03-19-2025, 07:27 AM
0 responses
57 views
0 reactions
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 03-18-2025, 12:50 PM
0 responses
50 views
0 reactions
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 03-03-2025, 01:15 PM
0 responses
200 views
0 reactions
Last Post seqadmin  
Working...