Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • mike_m
    Junior Member
    • Jan 2014
    • 1

    DESeq 2 shrinkage Wald test vs. LR test

    This is more a conceptual question to those in the know (particularly Mike Love, Simon Anders and Wolfgang Huber if you're reading).

    I'm doing a slightly quick a dirty analysis using DESeq2 to test for interactions between 3 biological conditions and expression changes over time (only between 2 time points, so one hope issues of sphericity/autocorrelation do not become an issue).

    The current implementation using the Wald test will, by default, apply a beta prior to moderate the effect sizes from the GLM. I understand the default implementation as the Wald test uses the effect size estimates to calculate the p-value that the effect is different from zero. The likelihood ratio test does not require an accurate effect size estimate as I understand it, therefore I assume that this is the reason there is no default implementation for the effect size estimate moderation, or is there a mathematical reason for this?

    Also, is there a way to extract the pre-moderated effect sizes in order to compare them to the moderated ones (regardless of which test is applied?).

    Thanks in advance.
  • Michael Love
    Senior Member
    • Jul 2013
    • 333

    #2
    hi Mike,

    Here's a post where I talk a bit about why we used the moderation of effect sizes only for the Wald test:

    Discussion of next-gen sequencing related bioinformatics: resources, algorithms, open source efforts, etc


    So it's default to have shrinkage with the Wald test, and no shrinkage with the LRT. Although both defaults can be overridden.

    Note that with interaction terms in the model, the shrinkage is only applied to the interaction terms (discussed in ?nbinomWaldTest and in the Methods of the preprint).

    There is a way to extract pre-moderated effect sizes in DESeq2 version 1.6, which will be released in October with Bioconductor v3.0. You simply:

    Code:
    results(dds, addMLE=TRUE)

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • seqadmin
      Pathogen Surveillance with Advanced Genomic Tools
      by seqadmin




      The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the need for proactive pathogen surveillance systems. As ongoing threats like avian influenza and newly emerging infections continue to pose risks, researchers are working to improve how quickly and accurately pathogens can be identified and tracked. In a recent SEQanswers webinar, two experts discussed how next-generation sequencing (NGS) and machine learning are shaping efforts to monitor viral variation and trace the origins of infectious...
      03-24-2025, 11:48 AM
    • seqadmin
      New Genomics Tools and Methods Shared at AGBT 2025
      by seqadmin


      This year’s Advances in Genome Biology and Technology (AGBT) General Meeting commemorated the 25th anniversary of the event at its original venue on Marco Island, Florida. While this year’s event didn’t include high-profile musical performances, the industry announcements and cutting-edge research still drew the attention of leading scientists.

      The Headliner
      The biggest announcement was Roche stepping back into the sequencing platform market. In the years since...
      03-03-2025, 01:39 PM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by seqadmin, 03-20-2025, 05:03 AM
    0 responses
    49 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post seqadmin  
    Started by seqadmin, 03-19-2025, 07:27 AM
    0 responses
    57 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post seqadmin  
    Started by seqadmin, 03-18-2025, 12:50 PM
    0 responses
    50 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post seqadmin  
    Started by seqadmin, 03-03-2025, 01:15 PM
    0 responses
    201 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post seqadmin  
    Working...