Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Testing a force topology in mrBayes

    Hello Everybody,


    I have a question related to "Testing a topological hypothesis". I have
    tried to run the same procedure as mentioned in the tutorial in order to
    check whether two species form monophyletic group or not. As far as i
    understand the manual- - by setting hard constraint we are forcing two
    species to form a monophyletic group every time. And by setting the
    negative constraint we should reproduce the original topology. However, In
    my case , after running the analysis as mentioned in the manual- both hard
    and negative constraint are producing the same tree. After running the
    stepping stone analysis, i am getting some weird output in log file:-

    "24600 -- [nan] (nan) (nan) (nan) * [nan] (nan) (nan) (nan) (...0 remote
    chains"

    Run Marginal likelihood (ln)
    ------------------------------
    1 nan
    2 nan
    ------------------------------
    Mean: nan

    As I am running the entire analysis on the cluster. So, here's the command
    i am using for this analysis:-

    "begin mrbayes;
    set autoclose=yes nowarn=yes;
    execute Set1_Out_Ehist_Concat.nexus;
    lset rates=invgamma;
    constraint subell = Asub Aell;
    constraint nosubell = Asub Aell;
    prset topologypr = constraints(subell);
    mcmc ngen=100000 samplefreq=100 printfreq=100 diagnfreq=1000
    file=PositiveConstraint;
    sump burnin=25000;
    sumt burnin=25000;
    prset topologypr = constraints(nosubell);
    mcmc ngen=100000 samplefreq=100 printfreq=100 diagnfreq=1000
    file=NegativeConstraint;
    sump burnin=25000;
    sumt burnin=25000;
    prset topologypr = constraints(subell);
    ss ngen=250000 diagnfreq=2500 filename=positive;
    prset topologypr = constraints(nosubell);
    ss filename=negative;
    quit;
    end;
    "

    Here the Asub and Aell are the two species name that i want to be force to
    form a monophyletic group in the hard constraint.


    Now I don't understand what is happening here. And my questions are :-

    1) Why i am getting the same tree after setting hard and negative
    constraint?
    2) What does this "*nan"* mean in the stepping stone analysis?
    3) How do i known if the procedure i am running is correct or not?


    As these question making me very confuse now. So I would highly appreciate
    any help and clarification on this questions. I have also posted this question on the mrbayes mailing list[http://sourceforge.net/p/mrbayes/mai...age/34174009/] as well as biostar[https://www.biostars.org/p/145595/], but i didn't get any reply.

    Very much looking forward for the answer

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • seqadmin
    Recent Innovations in Spatial Biology
    by seqadmin


    Spatial biology is an exciting field that encompasses a wide range of techniques and technologies aimed at mapping the organization and interactions of various biomolecules in their native environments. As this area of research progresses, new tools and methodologies are being introduced, accompanied by efforts to establish benchmarking standards and drive technological innovation.

    3D Genomics
    While spatial biology often involves studying proteins and RNAs in their...
    Yesterday, 07:30 PM
  • seqadmin
    Advancing Precision Medicine for Rare Diseases in Children
    by seqadmin




    Many organizations study rare diseases, but few have a mission as impactful as Rady Children’s Institute for Genomic Medicine (RCIGM). “We are all about changing outcomes for children,” explained Dr. Stephen Kingsmore, President and CEO of the group. The institute’s initial goal was to provide rapid diagnoses for critically ill children and shorten their diagnostic odyssey, a term used to describe the long and arduous process it takes patients to obtain an accurate...
    12-16-2024, 07:57 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by seqadmin, 12-30-2024, 01:35 PM
0 responses
22 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 12-17-2024, 10:28 AM
0 responses
41 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 12-13-2024, 08:24 AM
0 responses
55 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 12-12-2024, 07:41 AM
0 responses
41 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Working...
X