Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Compare bulk RNA-seq with single cell RNA-seq

    Hi everyone,
    I recently used 10X chromium techniques to do the single cell RNA-seq for my sample. I totally yielded about 3000 cells. I would like to compare the single cell transcriptome profile with the bulk RNA-seq using the same sample to check the consistency (correlation). However, 10X used the 3' sequencing strategy and produced UMI counts but bulk RNA-seq sequenced the whole transcript and produced RPKM. I would like to ask does it make sense to check their consistency with different sequencing strategy/units? If so, what is the best way to do this?

    Many thanks in advance!

  • #2
    I have heard presenters stating this to convince that their single cell data is reliable. I do not see any reason for this justification because of following:

    1- Bulk RNA-seq data resulting from the same sample using polyA capture and rRNA depletion are not highly correlated

    2- Bulk RNA-seq data resulting from the same sample using two different kits are even less correlated

    3- Assuming 10pg RNA/cell your combined total RNA input would be 30 ng. Most bulk RNA-seq kits require minimum 100 ng input so the results will not be comparable.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by nucacidhunter View Post
      3- Assuming 10pg RNA/cell your combined total RNA input would be 30 ng. Most bulk RNA-seq kits require minimum 100 ng input so the results will not be comparable.
      Generally once you're >30 cells the average expression starts to converge on bulk sequencing (Prepared by the same protocol). The issue here is that you can't recreate the 10X protocol on your bulk sample. In my experience with a different 3' scRNA method, you'd be lucky to get a correlation >0.7 compared to bulk conventional RNA-Seq.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by cmbetts View Post
        Generally once you're >30 cells the average expression starts to converge on bulk sequencing (Prepared by the same protocol).
        I wonder if there is any reference for this.

        Comment


        • #5
          I found this paper that suggests that at >10 cells expression converges to bulk (r = 0.92). But just to follow up, do you all suggest that there is no need to run a bulk sample as QC when running single cell RNA-seq? Obviously we would like to drop the sequencing costs if possible and not needing to sequence the bulk sample would be a relief.

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • seqadmin
            Investigating the Gut Microbiome Through Diet and Spatial Biology
            by seqadmin




            The human gut contains trillions of microorganisms that impact digestion, immune functions, and overall health1. Despite major breakthroughs, we’re only beginning to understand the full extent of the microbiome’s influence on health and disease. Advances in next-generation sequencing and spatial biology have opened new windows into this complex environment, yet many questions remain. This article highlights two recent studies exploring how diet influences microbial...
            02-24-2025, 06:31 AM
          • seqadmin
            Quality Control Essentials for Next-Generation Sequencing Workflows
            by seqadmin




            Like all molecular biology applications, next-generation sequencing (NGS) workflows require diligent quality control (QC) measures to ensure accurate and reproducible results. Proper QC begins at nucleic acid extraction and continues all the way through to data analysis. This article outlines the key QC steps in an NGS workflow, along with the commonly used tools and techniques.

            Nucleic Acid Quality Control
            Preparing for NGS starts with isolating the...
            02-10-2025, 01:58 PM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by seqadmin, 03-03-2025, 01:15 PM
          0 responses
          28 views
          0 likes
          Last Post seqadmin  
          Started by seqadmin, 02-28-2025, 12:58 PM
          0 responses
          124 views
          0 likes
          Last Post seqadmin  
          Started by seqadmin, 02-24-2025, 02:48 PM
          0 responses
          485 views
          0 likes
          Last Post seqadmin  
          Started by seqadmin, 02-21-2025, 02:46 PM
          0 responses
          241 views
          0 likes
          Last Post seqadmin  
          Working...
          X