Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • frymor
    Senior Member
    • May 2010
    • 151

    fastqc shows strange GC content

    Hi,

    we have a 36-samples ChIP-Seq experiment with a very strange GC-content behavior (s. images)
    The samples are from yeast. This strange behavior comes in the IP samples, some of them shows (the first image is from such a file) in the fastqc report an over-representative accumulation of certain sequences, such as
    Code:
    GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG
    TGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG	
    TTGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG
    AGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG
    But some of them don't ( the second image is from a file with no(!) over-rep. sequences at all.
    Other than that the report looks quite good with no abnormalities (except the GC content).

    I was thinking that this curve might be due to the over-rep. polyG sequences, but what about the samples where there is no apparent accumulation of such sequences. Is there a possible biological reason for this thing?

    The problem occurs only in the IP samples. Is it possible that lack of biological material for the sequencer for this samples causes the machine to put a G (or identify a G ) intread of the real nt?
    we are using a nextseq500 with a high kit from Illumina

    thanks
    Assa
    Attached Files
  • frymor
    Senior Member
    • May 2010
    • 151

    #2
    I just wanted to add that this case is even stranger, as i have this sample, where the GC content is classified as good, even though it is completely shifted to the left.

    Q: How does fastqc calculate the theoretical GC content?
    Attached Files

    Comment

    • nucacidhunter
      Jafar Jabbari
      • Jan 2013
      • 1250

      #3
      The plots that you are referring should show normal distribution around the GC content of genome in a random library. But IP is not expected to be random so there would be a bias. Extreme GC at the start of reads could also be due to library construction method where some non-template bases are added.

      Stretches of G in NextSeq data indicates that there was not any signal in those cycles which could be due to short inserts and adapter dimers. F

      From FastQC manual:

      “This module measures the GC content across the whole length of each sequence in a file and compares it to a modelled normal distribution of GC content.”

      “An unusually shaped distribution could indicate a contaminated library or some other kinds of biased subset. A normal distribution which is shifted indicates some systematic bias which is independent of base position. If there is a systematic bias which creates a shifted normal distribution then this won't be flagged as an error by the module since it doesn't know what your genome's GC content should be.”

      Comment

      • kmcarr
        Senior Member
        • May 2008
        • 1181

        #4
        Originally posted by frymor View Post
        Hi,

        we have a 36-samples ChIP-Seq experiment with a very strange GC-content behavior (s. images)
        The samples are from yeast. This strange behavior comes in the IP samples, some of them shows (the first image is from such a file) in the fastqc report an over-representative accumulation of certain sequences, such as
        Code:
        GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG
        TGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG	
        TTGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG
        AGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG
        But some of them don't ( the second image is from a file with no(!) over-rep. sequences at all.
        Other than that the report looks quite good with no abnormalities (except the GC content).

        I was thinking that this curve might be due to the over-rep. polyG sequences, but what about the samples where there is no apparent accumulation of such sequences. Is there a possible biological reason for this thing?

        The problem occurs only in the IP samples. Is it possible that lack of biological material for the sequencer for this samples causes the machine to put a G (or identify a G ) intread of the real nt?
        we are using a nextseq500 with a high kit from Illumina


        thanks
        Assa
        frymor,

        You correctly identified the cause in your last statement above. The Illumina NextSeq500 (and NovaSeq) use 2 Color Chemistry for tagging and identifying bases. Using this system G's are defined by the absence of a fluorescent signal. This means that anything which can cause a cluster to stop producing a signal with result in a polyG output. A much better and more thorough explanation can be found in this QC Fail post.

        Comment

        • nucacidhunter
          Jafar Jabbari
          • Jan 2013
          • 1250

          #5
          Stretches of G in NextSeq indicates lack of signal in those cycles and it could be result of short inserts and adapter-dimer.

          In a shot gun library GC content peak will be representative of genome GC but IP pull down is not random and some bias is expected depending on what sequences are pulled down and enriched.

          From FastQC manual:

          "This module measures the GC content across the whole length of each sequence in a file and compares it to a modelled normal distribution of GC content."

          "An unusually shaped distribution could indicate a contaminated library or some other kinds of biased subset. A normal distribution which is shifted indicates some systematic bias which is independent of base position. If there is a systematic bias which creates a shifted normal distribution then this won't be flagged as an error by the module since it doesn't know what your genome's GC content should be."

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • seqadmin
            Pathogen Surveillance with Advanced Genomic Tools
            by seqadmin




            The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the need for proactive pathogen surveillance systems. As ongoing threats like avian influenza and newly emerging infections continue to pose risks, researchers are working to improve how quickly and accurately pathogens can be identified and tracked. In a recent SEQanswers webinar, two experts discussed how next-generation sequencing (NGS) and machine learning are shaping efforts to monitor viral variation and trace the origins of infectious...
            03-24-2025, 11:48 AM
          • seqadmin
            New Genomics Tools and Methods Shared at AGBT 2025
            by seqadmin


            This year’s Advances in Genome Biology and Technology (AGBT) General Meeting commemorated the 25th anniversary of the event at its original venue on Marco Island, Florida. While this year’s event didn’t include high-profile musical performances, the industry announcements and cutting-edge research still drew the attention of leading scientists.

            The Headliner
            The biggest announcement was Roche stepping back into the sequencing platform market. In the years since...
            03-03-2025, 01:39 PM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by seqadmin, 03-20-2025, 05:03 AM
          0 responses
          49 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post seqadmin  
          Started by seqadmin, 03-19-2025, 07:27 AM
          0 responses
          57 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post seqadmin  
          Started by seqadmin, 03-18-2025, 12:50 PM
          0 responses
          50 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post seqadmin  
          Started by seqadmin, 03-03-2025, 01:15 PM
          0 responses
          201 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post seqadmin  
          Working...