Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • sulfobus
    Member
    • Oct 2009
    • 12

    Homopolymer run errors, polyA bias

    Pyrosequencing has problems with determining the correct number of bases in a homopolymer stretch. However, we notice that this problem is much more frequent with polyA than polyT/C/G. How can that be?

    I found a paper describing roughly the same thing (but with polyA/T), but without any explanation. Could it be that the fluorescent reporter used for dATP is weaker than for the other bases, making it more difficult to determine peak size? The problem starts already at a three base repeat, giving ~10-20% sequences with runs of lengths two, four, five and even six bases.
  • pmiguel
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2008
    • 2328

    #2
    Originally posted by sulfobus View Post
    Pyrosequencing has problems with determining the correct number of bases in a homopolymer stretch. However, we notice that this problem is much more frequent with polyA than polyT/C/G. How can that be?

    I found a paper describing roughly the same thing (but with polyA/T), but without any explanation. Could it be that the fluorescent reporter used for dATP is weaker than for the other bases, making it more difficult to determine peak size? The problem starts already at a three base repeat, giving ~10-20% sequences with runs of lengths two, four, five and even six bases.
    Pyrosequencing does not use fluors. It detects the pyrophosphate released by the polymerase from dNTPs as they are incorporated into the nascent strand. PPi release is coupled ultimately to luciferase-catylyzed emission of light.

    Most likely this is a software bug I would guess. Have you used Roche software to look at the flowgrams of reads with poly A length miscalls? If they look different than poly A/C/G, then I would suspect chemistry. Otherwise, more like a software issue.

    --
    Phillip

    Comment

    • pmiguel
      Senior Member
      • Aug 2008
      • 2328

      #3
      Originally posted by sulfobus View Post
      I found a paper describing roughly the same thing (but with polyA/T), but without any explanation.
      By the way, that paper is from the dawn of next gen sequencing--2006! It was GS-20 data. I'm pretty sure the situation is no where nears as bad these days. What version of Roche software generated your basecalls?

      Comment

      • sulfobus
        Member
        • Oct 2009
        • 12

        #4
        Actually, we don't sequence ourselves but our sequence provider didn't know what could cause this bias. I will bring up the suggestion about software bug with them, and ask them to use the latest version of the basecalling software. Thanks Phillip!

        Comment

        • pmiguel
          Senior Member
          • Aug 2008
          • 2328

          #5
          Originally posted by sulfobus View Post
          Actually, we don't sequence ourselves but our sequence provider didn't know what could cause this bias. I will bring up the suggestion about software bug with them, and ask them to use the latest version of the basecalling software. Thanks Phillip!
          That said, I'm not sure that newer versions of the software fix this problem. But it is worth a shot.

          Comment

          • hyjkim
            Member
            • Apr 2010
            • 18

            #6
            Pyrosequencing uses dATP-α-S rather than standard dATP. This is due to nonspecific activity in luciferase using standard dATP. Polymerase is able to incorporate the modified dATP-α-S wherase luciferase cannot. However, the ability of polymerase to incorporate a dATP-α-S is less than standard dATP.

            The problems with homopolymers you are seeing is a known problem with the platform. If homopolymers are a large concern, you should try a different platform for sequencing.

            Comment

            • pmiguel
              Senior Member
              • Aug 2008
              • 2328

              #7
              Originally posted by hyjkim View Post
              Pyrosequencing uses dATP-α-S rather than standard dATP. This is due to nonspecific activity in luciferase using standard dATP. Polymerase is able to incorporate the modified dATP-α-S wherase luciferase cannot. However, the ability of polymerase to incorporate a dATP-α-S is less than standard dATP.

              Good to know!

              Yes, now that I look, I see a ref for it:

              Ronaghi, M., Karamouhamed, S., Pettersson, B., Uhlen, M., and
              Nyren, P. (1996) "Real-time DNA sequencing using detection of
              pyrophosphate release". Anal. Biochem. 242, 84–89

              Also, apparently the S enantiomer of dATP-a-S is the substrate usable by a polymerase. The R stereoisomer inhibits the polymerization. See:

              Gharizadeh et al. (2002). "Long-read pyrosequencing using pure 2'-deoxyadenosine-5'-O'-(1-thiotriphosphate) Sp-isomer". Anal Biochem 301: 82.

              Any chemists know of conditions that might racemize the pure S isomers dATP-a-S that Roche is presumably utilizing in their reagents? We would want to avoid that.

              --
              Phillip

              Comment

              Latest Articles

              Collapse

              • seqadmin
                Pathogen Surveillance with Advanced Genomic Tools
                by seqadmin




                The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the need for proactive pathogen surveillance systems. As ongoing threats like avian influenza and newly emerging infections continue to pose risks, researchers are working to improve how quickly and accurately pathogens can be identified and tracked. In a recent SEQanswers webinar, two experts discussed how next-generation sequencing (NGS) and machine learning are shaping efforts to monitor viral variation and trace the origins of infectious...
                03-24-2025, 11:48 AM
              • seqadmin
                New Genomics Tools and Methods Shared at AGBT 2025
                by seqadmin


                This year’s Advances in Genome Biology and Technology (AGBT) General Meeting commemorated the 25th anniversary of the event at its original venue on Marco Island, Florida. While this year’s event didn’t include high-profile musical performances, the industry announcements and cutting-edge research still drew the attention of leading scientists.

                The Headliner
                The biggest announcement was Roche stepping back into the sequencing platform market. In the years since...
                03-03-2025, 01:39 PM

              ad_right_rmr

              Collapse

              News

              Collapse

              Topics Statistics Last Post
              Started by seqadmin, 03-20-2025, 05:03 AM
              0 responses
              49 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post seqadmin  
              Started by seqadmin, 03-19-2025, 07:27 AM
              0 responses
              57 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post seqadmin  
              Started by seqadmin, 03-18-2025, 12:50 PM
              0 responses
              50 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post seqadmin  
              Started by seqadmin, 03-03-2025, 01:15 PM
              0 responses
              200 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post seqadmin  
              Working...